Skip to main content

Making new chairs - the exhibition Perch: the practice of sitting Part 1

On Sunday last, my exhibition of new seating forms opened at Manning Clark House in Forrest. a suburb of Canberra. For those of you who don't recognise the name or know anything about the building, a brief potted intro.

Manning Clark was a historian, which isn't of itself wildly interesting, except he was pivotal in establishing Australian history as its own worthy discipline rather than as the poor distant cousin to the mighty histories of our imperial masters, American cousins or European forebears. Clark was the first professor of Australian history at ANU, and whilst there also wrote his six volume History of Australia.

The home that he and his wife Dymphna commissioned in 1951 was designed by the Melbourne architect Robin Boyd. At the time, Boyd was establishing himself as one of Australia's modernist pioneers, writing weekly columns which attempted to persuade and badger the average aspirational suburban dweller to aspire to something more interesting than neat edged lawns, pastel laminex and a Hills hoist.

The house he designed for the Clarks is one of his earliest pieces, and one of only two domestic dwellings built in Canberra. At the time when the house was built, most of the surrounding blocks were still empty. The neighbouring areas had a mixture of Canberra's arts and crafts bungalows of the 1920s and 30s, and the more imposing pastiches of English garden suburb grandeur. Boyd's gleaming white modernist temple set on a ridge with its diurnal wings must have been starkly visible and starkly representative of the dreaded bohemian life of the Clarks, and their arty smart university set.

The Clarks were very engaged with the cultural and political life of both Canberra and Australia more widely, with the house famous for its dinners, soirees and social life of discussion, gossip and intellectualism that university towns such as Canberra can occasionally throw up. Following Dymphna's death in 2000, the house has remained pretty much as it was during their long occupation, and now provides a wide cultural and political program, including small exhibitions.

When I was first offered an exhibition opportunity, the history of the house, its occupants and its architect suggested differing narratives that an exhibition might explore. One theme in particular still fascinates me. The internal spaces that Boyd designed are both well scaled to the domestic but also uncompromisingly modernist in intent and ambiance. Frequently such homes are either fitted out with modernist interiors or furnished with pieces by Eames, Meadmore, Featherstone, and by the 1960s, the Scandinavian moderns. When I first visited the house, I assumed, wrongly, that the chairs filling the  lounge room were gathered to replace pieces that presumably the family had taken on Dymphna's death. Instead, as the photos shot in the late 1990s show, they are the chairs, tables that the family used during their decades of occupation. The Clarks took the very bold decision to commission a modernist architect to build them a home and yet furnished it with objects that made no claims to a modernist ideals whatsoever. A few Ward pieces which are somewhat Barnes-like in their simplicity; a couple of astonishingly heavy oak baronial chairs, and a scattering of a few other odds and bits and pieces.

I was gobsmacked. That an architect such as Boyd did not force his clients to furnish the house as he would have assumed they should posed a fascinating question. How would you furnish the living spaces? Boyd, unlike a lot of architects, did little furniture design. He certainly used a lot of built-ins but at at the time, he hadn't designed his own range of pieces to fill his clients' homes. But even in the early 1950s, Australia had a number of furniture designers and manufacturers producing modernist work. In other buildings (such as the Fenner House) Boyd did specify modernist furnishings. A brief investigation of the Clark-Boyd letters in the NLA didn't offer an explanation as to how or why they avoided the dictates of Boyd's modernist interiors.

But then reality came to visit and after a few weeks' sketching up pieces, having less than 6 months to make a roomful of furniture whilst also having to most tediously earn a living put paid to those notions. And there was another factor - it is very presumptive to assume that the Clarks' choices of their own furniture had no validity.

So I returned to what has been my obsession for over 15 years; ergonomic seating.


Popular posts from this blog

Social media - useful or evil necessity?

There are many many people much better placed to discuss this topic than I am, but my usual state of annoyance with any form of social media is at a particularly high pitch of late so I thought it terribly helpful for the state of the planet to share my thoughts on this weighty topic from the perceptive of a maker who feebly attempts to use it to 'boost her presence."
Firstly, it always seems to be slightly last year. Yes there are committed users, rather like the ageing fans of Happy Days who still think the Fonz  is the epitomeof cool, not to mention the marketing specialists who can roll out hundreds of excellent reasons as to why you should, including compelling examples of fortunes made, reputations enhanced and products sold in their, well, dozens but what if, at the end of the day, you're just pretty rubbish at it.
Allow me to snap at the hand that one day may offer crumbs from its table...
FacebookThis is obviously modelled on the second circle of hell. You have no c…

An Anniversary

Gazelle table, Judy Kensley McKie - Mahogany, paint, glass, 34"H x 60"W x 18" D

Pritam & Eames Gallery in East Hampton, New York is perhaps the best known commercial gallery focusing on studio furniture in the US today. Since 1981, the gallery has shown just about all of the major makers in the States.

Over June, the gallery held an Anniversary show which included Judy Kensley McKie, Wendy Maruyama and Rich Tannen. Bear with the rather odd layout of the Pritam website - for whatever reason they seem very reluctant to use Flash to display the images...

They will also be holding a show, Seating, from August 6 which should also be very interesting....
"Eggo" Wall vessel, Don Miller - Bleached white oak, 31"H x 18"W x 7.5"D

Raw linseed oil is not a furniture or joinery finish

Repeat after me.....

Raw linseed oil is not a furniture or joinery finish
Raw linseed oil is not a furniture or joinery finish
Raw linseed oil is not a furniture or joinery finish

Raw linseed oil, if it dries at all, dries very very slowly over many months. You might be lucky if you apply it and then rub it all off, but most of time it will linger on the surface, gradually becoming stickier and stickier.

Nor is it temperature or UV resistant. In areas under windows or near stovetops, it will break down or blister. On furniture, it will darken over time til it's almost black, particularly on areas where the piece might be handled such as the back of chairs.

And it will be sticky. And extremely difficult to remove later on.

Oil finishes either have to rely on the oil being modified during its manufacture with the addition of driers or being able to polymerise themselves. Polymerisation means that within hopefully less than 4-6 weeks, the oil's solvent has evaporated, it's ox…